March 21, 2024 | 1:00 PM ET

From appealing non-compliance reports to product labeling to recent inspection issues and policy updates, the Meat Institute's bi-monthly Regulatory Services Update provides members access to experts who understand how to navigate the regulatory environment. We offer a wealth of resources and support to meet and exceed compliance standards and provide guidance on FSIS policy, HACCP, enforcement actions, and recalls, among other regulatory topics. Keep up with ever-changing rules and regulations, join us for our next update on Thursday, March 21, and stay fully informed on changes affecting your business.

This month's update will cover:

  • Update on California General Industry Workplace Violence Prevention Law (SB 553), ConnMacielCarey LLP
  • NR Workshop
  • Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Overview - Question/Concern Solicitation
  • PHIS Issues Discussion and Solicitation - Question/Concern Solicitation 
    • In plant implementation
    • PHIS help desk efficiency/problems
    • Export Module update
  • Hot Topics 

 

Stay fully informed on changes affecting your business and sign up to receive updates and community newsletters from NAMI's Regulatory Services team.

The meat industry is uniting for the future by committing to the Protein PACT, which provides robust metrics for continuous improvement in food safety, among other operational areas. 

Roya Galindo
Roya Galindo
Meat Institute
Director of Regulatory Services
Roya Galindo serves as the Meat Institute’s director of regulatory services. She first began her career in 2005 when she was one of the first successful consumer safety inspector interns (CSI) to complete the internship program for the Food Safety and Inspection Service. She worked as a CSI for a few years until she was quickly promoted to an Enforcement Investigation Analysis Officer (EIAO). After mentoring many of the EIAOs, Galindo switched gears and worked for the industry managing and refining establishment’s food safety systems. Galindo’s extensive background in industry and regulations allows her to provide the members with guidance on a wide array of subjects.

Clarissa Moreaux
Clarissa Moreaux
Meat Institute
Director, Regulatory Services
Clarissa Moreaux serves as the Meat Institute's director of regulatory services, where she provides expertise on a variety of topics, including HACCP, labeling, enforcement actions, noncompliance appeals, inspection issues, and import/export issues, among other regulatory topics.

Prior to joining NAMI, Clarissa began her regulatory career in 2010 as an Enforcement Investigation Analysis Officer (EIAO) for the Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) where she enforced FSIS regulatory requirements and gained valuable knowledge and experience that is currently used to help members. She later moved on to work for the industry in regulatory affairs and corporate quality assurance roles covering FDA and FSIS regulated products. She has experience with both USDA-FSIS and FDA food safety systems, 3rd party audit standards, supply chain, labeling, and regulatory compliance.

Clarissa has a Bachelor of Science in Food and Nutritional Sciences from Fresno State University of California and a Master’s of Science in Global Supply Chain Management from University of Southern California, Marshall School of Business. She is HACCP certified, Preventative Controls Qualified Individual (PCQI) and Lean Six Sigma Green Belt.

Norm Robertson
Mr. Norm Robertson
Meat Institute
Vice President, Regulatory
Norm Robertson serves as the Meat Institute's vice president of regulatory services. Prior to joining NAMI, Robertson served as the Executive Associate Director of Regulatory Issues at the North American Meat Association (NAMA), where he managed a highly skilled Regulatory Services staff. He began his career as a Slaughter Food Inspector in Vernon, California, in 1990. Robertson was promoted to an off line pro­cessing position in 1993 and then to a Consumer Safety Inspector position in the Long Beach Circuit in 1994. In 2001, Robertson was selected as one of two individuals to be promoted to the position of Consumer Safety Officer (CSO), now referred to as an Enforcement Investigation and Analysis Officer (EIAO), in the Alameda District. After work­ing for almost two years as a CSO, he was selected to be a Frontline Supervisor (FLS) in Vernon and then Petaluma, California, and finally as the District Case Specialist in the Alameda District. Robertson participated in national-level workgroups and assisted in the official classroom training of subsequent EIAO classes during his time at USDA. Robertson’s experience working at various levels of USDA has provided him with a detailed and thorough understanding of how the regulatory Agency operates, which adds a strong regulatory skill set to help our general members navigate the regulatory environment.

Rachel Conn
Rachel Conn
Conn Maciel Carey LLP's
Partner and Chair
Rachel L. Conn is a Partner and Chair of Conn Maciel Carey LLP’s California Practice.  She is based out of the firm’s San Francisco office. Rachel’s practice focuses on OSH compliance and litigation, including inspections, audits, investigations, and enforcement actions involving Cal/OSHA, fed OSHA, and other State OSH Plans. She also represents employers and trade associations in Cal/OSHA and fed OSHA rulemakings. Previously, Rachel was a partner and led the national OSHA Practice at an AmLaw 100 law firm.

Megan Shaked
Megan Shaked
Conn Maciel Carey LLP
Partner
Megan S. Shaked is a Partner in the San Francisco office of Conn Maciel Carey LLP.  Ms. Shaked represents clients in inspections, investigations, and enforcement actions involving Cal/OSHA.  She also represents clients against claims brought by patrons alleging lack of accessibility under Title III of the ADA and the California Unruh and Disabled Persons Acts. In addition, she represents employers on a wide range of employment matters, including claims of discrimination and harassment, wrongful termination, wage and hour violations, and whistleblowing.  She also represents clients against claims brought by patrons alleging lack of accessibility under Title III of the ADA and the California Unruh and Disabled Persons Acts.